Kibbe Type Comparison
Can't decide if you're a Soft Natural or Romantic? You're not alone—this is one of the most common points of confusion in the Kibbe system.

The Soft Natural versus Romantic debate is one of the most common sources of confusion in the Kibbe community. Both types share a yin softness that manifests as curves and rounded flesh, leading many women to bounce between these two image identities for months or even years. The confusion is understandable—at first glance, both types appear soft, curvy, and feminine. However, understanding the fundamental difference between these types comes down to one critical element: the underlying bone structure that everything else is built upon.
Soft Natural
Soft Yang
Approachable and feminine. Soft Naturals blend the Natural's relaxed bone structure with soft, curved flesh.
Full Soft Natural GuideRomantic
Pure Yin
Soft, sensual, and feminine. Romantics are the embodiment of yin - soft, rounded, and lush.
Full Romantic GuideThese types get confused because they share visible softness. Both Soft Naturals and Romantics tend to have curves, soft flesh, and a feminine appearance. When you look in the mirror and see curves, it's natural to think "Romantic." But Kibbe's system isn't primarily about curves—it's about bone structure first, flesh second. The yin in Soft Natural comes from soft flesh layered over a yang (wide, blunt) frame. The yin in Romantic comes from both soft flesh AND soft, delicate bones. This is why two women can look equally "curvy" but be completely different types.
The defining difference is WIDTH. This is the single most important factor. Soft Naturals have width in their bone structure—you'll see it in their shoulders, ribcage, or hip bones. This width creates a frame that needs to be accommodated in clothing. Romantics, by contrast, have delicate, narrow bone structure. Their curves come purely from flesh, not from wide bones. If you trace the outline of a Soft Natural's skeleton, you'd see angles and width. Trace a Romantic's skeleton, and you'd see small, rounded, delicate bones. David Kibbe describes Romantics as having "double curve"—a snowman-like silhouette where rounded shapes stack on top of each other without any angular interruption.
Let's examine bone structure in detail. A Soft Natural's shoulders will appear slightly broad or blunt—not sharp like a Dramatic, but definitely not sloped or narrow. Their ribcage often has width, and their hip bones may be prominent or square-ish even when covered with soft flesh. The overall impression is of a strong frame softened by curves. A Romantic's bone structure tells a completely different story. Their shoulders slope downward and inward. Their bones throughout the body are small and delicate. Even a Romantic with a larger body size will have small wrists, small hands, and a general delicacy to their frame. The bones don't create any angles or width—everything rounds and curves. This is why Romantics can't wear the relaxed, unconstructed clothing that flatters Soft Naturals; without width to fill it out, the clothes just hang and overwhelm their delicate frame.
| Soft Natural | Romantic |
|---|---|
Moderate vertical line | Rounded, soft bones |
Slightly wide shoulders | Sloping shoulders |
Blunt bone edges | Short to moderate vertical |
Moderate frame | Small, delicate frame |
Slightly square silhouette | Rounded edges |
Both types have soft, yin flesh, but it distributes differently due to their underlying frames. On a Soft Natural, flesh tends to accumulate evenly and creates gentle curves that soften the underlying width. The waist may be defined, but the overall silhouette has a softened rectangular or hourglass quality. The flesh follows the width of the frame. Romantic flesh creates the famous "double curve" or hourglass figure because it has no angular frame to interrupt it. The flesh rounds out from the bust, curves in dramatically at the waist, and rounds out again at the hips. This creates that snowman-like stack of circles that Kibbe describes. Romantics also tend to have very soft, fleshy arms and legs without much visible muscle definition, while Soft Naturals may show some underlying musculature or sinew through their softness.
| Soft Natural | Romantic |
|---|---|
Soft, curved flesh | Very soft, lush |
Gentle curves at bust/hips | Full bust and hips |
Soft arms and thighs | Defined waist |
Slightly fleshy waist | Rounded curves everywhere |
Rounded overall | Soft arms and thighs |
Here's a simple test: Stand in front of a mirror in a fitted tank top. Look at your shoulder line. Do your shoulders extend outward before sloping down, creating width? That's Soft Natural. Do your shoulders simply slope downward from your neck without extending outward first? That's Romantic. Another test: Look at your hands and wrists. Romantics almost always have notably small, delicate hands and narrow wrists regardless of their overall body size. Soft Naturals have moderate to slightly wide hands and wrists. Finally, try on an oversized, unconstructed blazer. Does it look effortlessly chic, like you just threw it on? You're likely a Soft Natural. Does it completely overwhelm you and make you look like you're drowning in fabric? You're likely a Romantic.
Consider Scarlett Johansson (Soft Natural) versus Marilyn Monroe (Romantic). Both are famous for their curves and sex appeal, but their frames are fundamentally different. Scarlett has width in her shoulders and ribcage. Even at her slimmest, you can see the underlying frame creating that width. Her curves are beautiful, but they're built on a sturdy foundation. In relaxed, unconstructed clothing, she looks amazing because her frame fills it out. Marilyn, despite being equally curvy, had none of that width. Her shoulders sloped delicately, her bones were small throughout, and her curves were pure flesh with no angular interruption. Put Marilyn in a boxy blazer and she'd be overwhelmed; put Scarlett in one and it looks intentional and chic. Marilyn needed curve-hugging, draped fabrics to look her best because she had nothing but curves to work with.
Soft Natural Celebrities
Scarlett Johansson
Gigi Hadid
Jennifer Lopez
Kate Winslet
Sydney Sweeney
Romantic Celebrities
Kate Winslet
Drew Barrymore
Christina Ricci
Emilia Clarke
Helena Bonham Carter
The most common mistake is equating curves with Romantic. Many Soft Naturals see their curves and immediately assume Romantic, not realizing that their width is the dominant characteristic. Remember: Kibbe always looks at bone structure FIRST. Your flesh (where curves come from) is secondary. A Soft Natural's curves are yin layered over a yang frame. A Romantic's curves are yin layered over more yin. The frame determines everything about how you should dress—not the curves themselves. Another common mistake is thinking height determines type. While Romantics are typically 5'5" or under, there's significant overlap in the height ranges. A petite woman with width is still a Soft Natural, not a Romantic.
Soft Naturals thrive in relaxed, unconstructed silhouettes that honor their width. Think flowy tops, oversized sweaters, and relaxed blazers. The key is accommodating their frame's width while letting their softness show through. Stiff, structured clothing fights against their natural lines. Romantics need the opposite: clothing that follows every curve closely. Draped fabrics, wrap styles, and fitted silhouettes work because there's no width or angles to accommodate. The fabric should flow around the body like water, hugging the curves. Anything boxy or shapeless makes a Romantic look heavier and overwhelmed because it ignores the beautiful curves that define their silhouette.
Soft Natural Style Recommendations
Romantic Style Recommendations
Our AI-powered Kibbe body type test analyzes your proportions from photos and can help determine whether you're a Soft Natural or Romantic in just minutes.
Take the Kibbe Body Type Test